Miner- SILENTARMY v5

Mining
674

I would switch to SA3 in an instant.

I don’t have issues with Ubuntu or anything like that however I don’t switch because like most veteran litecoin miners most of my hardware is Pitcairn and Tahiti (7850, 270x, 7950, 7970, 280x, etc) Most of those GPUs are slow with SA3. Unless Tahiti’s have been able to get 50Sol/s yet?

Another issue is with the AMDGPU-PRO drivers, many of my rigs have 5x RX470 with 1x of an old 7850 or 7950 due to the screen display issue where the card disables itself when its headless.Its not possible to run a 470 with a 7850 on linux at the moment. But its possible in Windows.

675

h_1478422695_8790146_002b1b2143.png1424×672 107 KB

1 Like
676

if he does not release the rest of his code, how do we know that is all he took???

677

It is not because a code is not released that you cannot see some parts of it from the binaries.

678

so what does that tell you? what is your opinion?
he removed the miners so obviously he was in the wrong, but do you think there is more of marc’s code we do not know about?
like hotmetal, im not an expert or programmer, but I think we all feel more was copied

679

He owned up and is taking the code out of his miner, said he was in a hurry to release miner and overlooked that he’d left the bllake in his code. For perspective, he was in a hurry. Seems like the involved parties have come to a resolution, let it go.

1 Like
680

Obviously Marc published his code way before Claymore, plus Claymore acknowledged that he took it from him.
The issue here is that Claymore makes money from the miner. How would you feel if someone took your work to make money from it ?
I am not a programmer but I know how to copy/paste and add a fee. Too easy, not fair.

1 Like
681

It wasn’t a small part, it was all of it…

1 Like
682

Drama queens, they’ve worked it out, why are you still obsessing over this?

683

I just found out right now so it’s been few minutes. I’m not obsessed personally, I’m going out all day and leave my mining farm to work.

684

People hate thieves. Thieves who charge you 2.5% to use someone else’s work.
Doesn’t matter if its resolved or not between themselves, we still dislike liars and thieves.

3 Likes
685

He can lie, why should i let it go? he should prove to people that none of the code is still in there when he releases his next miner

excatly, a thief can not be trusted, no reason to trust a thief because they say it is all removed… he should prove it… he was caught red handed

i agree, that is more than likely the case

686

It would be best for both parties if claymore would just remove the dev fees

Please hit like if you agree.

2 Likes
687

that it would, and he should really REFUND THOSE WHO GAVE HIM DEV ALREADY!
if not he is really an asshole

688

Saw a conversation between the original guy that wrote the code and claymore posted on BCT forum. The two involved parties have resolved it - you have a need to be involved in drama? What is your stake in this to be so concerned about some guy using some other guy’s code without credit? (neither of them being you)

Deuces, not wasting another second on this.

1 Like
689

obsessing? you mean we can’t even talk about it without you trying to insult us?
who are you OBAMA? if we want to talk, we can talk. don’t attempt to censor with your belittling

if you dont want to talk about it then dont, but dont tell me what I should say
I will say what I want, when I want… if you like it or not.

the only douche today is claymore

and he had no choice but to admit to it, he was CAUGHT RED HANDED

690

NO. Cool down. Its his now. He can share a portion to Marc. Relax man.

1 Like
691

he should send it back to the miners, thats my opinion and im allowed to have an opinion
no one should be using V1 or V1.1 and giving him fees through those releases.

people on bitcoin talk agree
"I think it would be best to both parties and to all miners if this would just be for free. Without the dev fees.
Please
remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for
the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think
@mrb would have no objection to that.

Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you."

692

Is there a most number of post award? @Shawn? I nominate @cryptomined

694

Hei there!

I have trouble with AMDGPU-PRO on my fresh installed Xubuntu 16.04. Installation works well and kernel module gets compiled. But after reboot, the kernel does not validate the signature.

amdgpu: module verification failed: signature and/or required key missing - tainting kernel

I wrote in Ubuntu forums and AMD forums, but they refuse to even read my posts. :cry: :joy:

Do you guys have an idea what to do?
Compiling a kernel with disabled signature verification fails for me. Did try different versions of the kernel. 4.4.0-45 was mentioned to work with the driver, but by Xubuntu 16.04 freezes at the login screen with this kernel. grr :rage:

Oh and Windows 10 fails to run my 6 GPUs (Sapphire Radeon RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB). It comes up with Code 43 on 2 cards. Sometimes even 4 or 5 cards. It can’t decide what to do… :unamused: