With ocminer’s fork of 0.2a, I’m getting a total of 50.6 Sol/s dual mining with i7 6700k at 4.5GHz and a GTX 970. The GTX 970 is mining at about 15 Sol/s I suppose b/c nicehash hasn’t released the better CUDA code. I also get 20.2 Sol/s on an i7 3770 stock, 16GB mem, win 10.
Are you charging 0.1 ZEC for withdrawals? Thats like $50 us dollars, very expensive. Please explain.
Huh what makes you think that? Withdrawal fee is 0.01 currently and will be set to whatever the wallet fee will be when sending funds.
I got it running on a windows machine, but on ubuntu with ocminer’s for 01c its not working, any ideas?
so blockchain reward doesn’t matter for you ? interesting …
@ocminer: does https://github.com/ocminer/nheqminer/archive/0.2a.tar.gz work on your pool when compiling on linux? (the code still seems to be hardcoded to use nicehash)
It failed for me too.
Excuse me, it’s not an amd compatible miner, it’s a “one-or-two-gpu-models” compatible miner.
Without having to read hundreds of replies.
WHICH AMD GPU MINER WILL WORK WITH THIS POOL?
Only Genoil ?
I’m having issues running Windows Version of Nicehash CPU+GPU Miner with Suprnova support:
https://github.com/ocminer/nheqminer/releases
C:\Users\User\Desktop\nheqminer_v0.2a_suprnova>nheqminer -u vapeador1 -p p -cd 0 -t 2
==================== www.nicehash.com ==================== Equihash CPU&GPU Miner for NiceHash v0.2a Thanks to Zcash developers for providing base of the code. Special thanks to tromp and xenoncat for providing optimized CPU and CUDA equihash solvers. ==================== www.nicehash.com ====================
Setting log level to 2
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.170337][0x00002da0]: Using SSE2: YES
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.171838][0x00002da0]: Using AVX: YES
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.172840][0x00002da0]: Using AVX2: YES
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.352450][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Starting miner
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.354686][0x000035d4]: miner#0 | Starting thread #0 (CPU-XENONCAT-AVX2)
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.354686][0x0000136c]: miner#1 | Starting thread #1 (CPU-XENONCAT-AVX2)
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.354904][0x00003180]: miner#2 | Starting thread #2 (CUDA-TROMP) GeForce GTX 1070 (#0) BLOCKS=105, THREADS=64
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.354904][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Connecting to stratum server equihash.eu.sup.rnova.cc:2142
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.537041][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Connected!
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.709665][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Subscribed to stratum server
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.711866][0x00001ec4]: miner | Extranonce is 32310010000000000000000010003133
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.885284][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Target set to 01e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1e1
[2016-10-28 02:16:35.889413][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Received new job #196
[2016-10-28 02:16:36.105163][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Worker not authorized: vapeador1
[2016-10-28 02:16:36.107070][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Disconnecting
[2016-10-28 02:16:36.108071][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Stopping miner
don’t know if there is a problem with equihash.eu.sup.rnova.cc:2142, but i can’t change it with -l command
hi there,
when using the EU servers zec-eu.suprnova.cc:2142 or port 2143, your (ocminer’s) nheqminer will get shares, but the correspondent worker is not shown in dashboard
on zec.suprnova.cc:2142 without problems
you must fill in your weblogin and worker name separated by “.”
“nheqminer -u vapeador1” must something be like “nheqminer -u vapeador.1”
(see line “[2016-10-28 02:16:36.105163][0x00001ec4]: stratum | Worker not authorized: vapeador1”)
Yes, thank you.
Solved it my usename in fact is different, so my login is username.vapeador1 thank you.
pretty decent Sol/s
[300 sec]: 17.6646 I/s, 35.2961 Sols/s
Hmm I just tried both, in fact my miner is currently connected to zec-eu.suprnova.cc:2142 and my hashrate is displayed fine on the dashboard…
remember -g 0 1
if you have two gpu is ok but onli one you pút
-g 0
i am working fine.
@ocminer is the web ui performance finalized already? i noticed the api returns 5XX or nothing many times, where xzc api at suprnova does work fine
ok, nevermind, I will just use the standard, will not have issues with my slow miner
The web frontend itself is okay, but indeed the API is getting hammered with about 190-220 requests/s and thats why it goes into a “anti-ddos” mode and reports 503 sometimes when it’s above threshold. I’m adding some resources so that should be on a separate server soon after launch. However this has no effect on availability or mining.
ok thanks, greatly appreciated
Since when does nheqminer supports -g switch???