Privacy will thrive in this kind of environment, as a way of protest.
Lack of critical thinking and reading skills will be the death of us.
Tip: she was not saying that having no privacy would be a good thing. This is the original text.
My biggest concern is all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.
Once in awhile I get annoyed about the fact that I have no real privacy. No where I can go and not be registered. I know that, somewhere, everything I do, think and dream of is recorded. I just hope that nobody will use it against me.
All in all, it is a good life. Much better than the path we were on, where it became so clear that we could not continue with the same model of growth.
I mean, no privacy is “all in all… a good life.” Much better than the alternative - those redneck morons without critical thinking and reading skills … those who tried to do something different against the dominant system. I mean, there are trade-offs but you’d be dumb not to choose the all-in-all better, no-privacy path.
It’s easy to misread something if you impose your ideology onto it. That’s not what she is trying to say.
Conrado, you’re completely twisted, but ok. Run like a sheep to the slaughter and trust in the government or better the WEF. Personally, I wouldn’t recommend it to you. Four years ago they wanted to kill 90% of all people, or in other words, decimate humanity. Do you think they have your best interests at heart? Quite the opposite.