How does unpaid balance get updated? Is it every time the pool finds a block?
Okay, restarted:
$ git clone https://github.com/etherchain-org/nheqminer.git
Cloning into 'nheqminer'...
remote: Counting objects: 13354, done.
remote: Total 13354 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 13354
Receiving objects: 100% (13354/13354), 49.10 MiB | 4.47 MiB/s, done.
Resolving deltas: 100% (3890/3890), done.
Checking connectivity... done.
$ cd nheqminer
$ mkdir build
$ cd build
$ qmake ../nheqminer/nheqminer.pro
$ make
<lots of stuff here ending with:>
atchIN5boost9iterators18transform_iteratorINS9_9algorithm6detail20copy_iterator_rangeFIS5_N9__gnu_cxx17__normal_iteratorIPcS5_EEEENSC_14split_iteratorISI_EENSA_11use_defaultESM_EEEEvT_SO_St12__false_type]+0x238): undefined reference to `std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::_M_create(unsigned long&, unsigned long)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [nheqminer] Error 1
Hey some of my workers are not showing up in the control panel while they work just fine in terminal! Whats going on ?
Anyone have the windows version of this miner? Their windows link gave a 404 error.
Windows:
Windows builds made by us are available here: https://github.com/etherchain-org/etherchain-org/releases
We are at block 615. Last block found by the pool was 594, 21 blocks ago. The pool reportedly handles 69kH our of a total network hashrate of 754kH, or 9.1% of the blocks. So out of the last 21 blocks, the pool should have found 1.911 or almost 2 blocks. The pool also reports 0.71 block found per hour out of the 24 blocks the network produces per hour . This is 2.9% of the blocks, as compared to the 9,1% of the network hashrate controlled by the pool. There is something that doesnât add up, This pool finds 66% less blocks than in should. Where is going all the additional hashpower?
What Linux version is this? I had the same or similar error on Ubuntu 14.04. It worked on 15.11.
Should work on ubuntu 16.04, can you try that?
I realy didnât expect that bug in this pool
Itâs Ubuntu Server 14.04 on an Amazon EC2 instance â I donât think I can upgrade the OS.
Is there any mining software, other than nheqminer, that I can point to flypool? Perhaps tromp?
This guy is stealing hash left and rightâŚ
69kH is flypool hashrate right now, it wasnt that the whole day so that may be why. Theres a lot of randomness too in mining blocks, its not going to be pin point. Not saying there isnt a problem but it may be normal.
1 Like
I used GitHub - nicehash/nheqminer: Equihash miner for NiceHash with cmake and it works on 14.04, but you need to add a small modification to main.cpp file.
Or you can just take nheqminer/main.cpp from the current sources you are using, and copy over to he nicehash one, then compile using the cmake method.
Yep, I am using the miner now and same problem:
nheqminer -l us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 -u ztMiVGoPYdwTZmVXSJMKpHjCJAiuG7NppQfPxSxBxvXypazsdWf5Z7xxxxxxG8Vscfu9rn.rig0
How often does the payout happen?
Look at the statistcs, the pool has been at more than 55kH since 2h. That doesnât explain 66% of the blocks missing. For every block we are paid for, there are two blocks we should have found statistically, but that are missing. Thatâs a 200% error. I donât call that rounding error, and itâs certainly not normal.
When you guys mind pasting your working start.bat file here so I can try out? Been trying whole day to get this to work but no luck yet. thx.
nheqminer.exe -l us1-zcash -u taddress.Bee2
Read the docs, seems this one needs a special -l address option for flypool:
In order to mine on flypool.org use the following command:
nheqminer.exe -u zcash-address.worker -l eu1-zcash
Full example:
nheqminer.exe -u tmUj1yAM1dr1Q2p4WHPivreSHuSdC3sc7V3.rig1 -l eu1-zcash
You can choose from the following servers:
EU1: nheqminer.exe -u tmUj1yAM1dr1Q2p4WHPivreSHuSdC3sc7V3.rig1 -l eu1-zcash
US1: nheqminer.exe -u tmUj1yAM1dr1Q2p4WHPivreSHuSdC3sc7V3.rig1 -l us1-zcash
CN1: nheqminer.exe -u tmUj1yAM1dr1Q2p4WHPivreSHuSdC3sc7V3.rig1 -l cn1-zcash
Thanks guys! That seemed to work. I was making it way too complicated. Perhaps I was confusing one minerâs batch file with another. After a long day, things get a little blurry. thx again.