Miner- Optiminer/Zcash GPU miner v1.7!

Mining
504

Claymore V5.0

183H/s Fury X
173H/s Fury
130H/s RX480

All on stock and similar low power draw like SA5

505

so far I din’t crash with 0.3.1, If it holds I don’t think I will switch because claymore’s not faster with RX cards following the latst results.
If it crashes I give claymore a try…

506

Great numbers for Claymore; Optiminer needs to also drop is fee to 2.5% or less to compete. Anyway the Dev fees are trivial to remove while maintaining the full hash rate.

2 Likes
507

Still need to wait to see on the pool side.

508

The current implementation has a bug, you need to wait for the next release.

509

Miner space race is on :smile:

1 Like
510

so i am trying out optiminer and it detects 3 gpu as it seems but only mines on 2
GPU1,GPU1, GPU2 but mines only on 2 with a total output of about 240 sol
3x rx480 stock

i tried to define them with -d 0 -d 1 -d 2 but that didn’t change anything
any ideas

511

Ok hashrate has caught up on pool
Claymore V5.0 is legit

512

rly, reboot to win?(

513

Easier to manage on Windows :imp:

514

Hashrate comparison, is it 1:1 with Optiminer?

515

I didn’t test Optiminer… but looking at other peoples numbers roughly yes

516

It is a bit slower than optiminer , but at least you can drop your voltages in windows :slight_smile:

6x 470 - optiminer - 670 sol/s - 730 watt
6x 470 - claymore 5.0 - 650 sol/s (-2.5% 633sol/s) - 530 watt

1 Like
517

mm… same speed. don’t wanna to reboot in win) yours 470 modded?

518

yea with 1375 memory timings.

519

Well, I can drop voltages in Ubuntu 14.04 too, with atitweak. But 200W difference is nice!

520

Use -i 2 and report back :stuck_out_tongue:

200w is a good drop

521

Same result , guess due the mining rig only having a G1840.

1 Like
522

Claymore 5.0 is a tad bit slower than Optiminer, but it also uses less power. Plugging in all the numbers into Whattomine.com, it turns out Optiminer wins this round.

523

Getting 125-130 sols on rx 470, better than optiminer.

1 Like