Adventurous! haha that is impressive actually. Probably the longest our miner has been ran.
As Omar says we are working on it. Cheers
2 Likes
are you saying that it supports AMD rx470? That’s good news
It started being built on an integrated nvidia laptop card, and is now being developed on an rx480. We are building very generic opencl so that as many cards as possible will work.
7 Likes
You are a rockstar man. If you can get this done, and Nicehash can roll it into their Windows binary a lot of people will be exceptionally happy. Maybe ask them to roll a Windows binary for standalone as well 
I am a top donor how can you identify me give me btc adress Ill send you now is the software working now!!
Thank YOu awaiting a positive answer
can someone help by estimating the following
If network hash rate/s is 169/s
difficulty is 1700
block size is 1000
and your hash rate of mining rig is 2 sol/s then what would you expect or what are the chances of mining a ZEC and after how much time plz can someone explain
thanks
Can you help me set this up
Just 2 questions regarding sorting: What kind of values have to be sorted and what’s the impact of a fast algorithm regarding expected hashrate? (Saw the comments on the non-optimal mixed Bitonic & Odd/Even in merge_sort_on_gpu.hpp)
regards,
Tender
Hi all, just tried the current kernel, with my 380 4G。 I got 160ms 6.25H/s with ububtu16.04. seems AMD card compare to Nvidia performance is too bad. sad:cry:
Zcash GPU Open-miner captain’s log 0.2.6:
We are making a lot of progress on the GPU miner both in terms of the solver kernel and the drop in replacement to zcashd. We will be working over the next week to make our miner compatible with the zcashd build and submit a PR if our solution rate seems worthy enough.
Many of you are already installing and testing our stand alone miner which is great, that gives experience running the software, but do keep in mind that the results on solution rate are not accurate right now. Anyone that claims this miner is producing a H/s is incorrect. The numbers right now are mere estimates of the time it needs to complete as the values are not correct. I can confirm that the steps needed to create a solution are taking place. But the real solution rate is yet to be determined.
That being said I will be posting an update within the next 24 hours that you can get the latest build and start producing real solutions. At that time all submissions of (Hardware type: Solution Rate) are welcome here.
As always thank you to those who are donating and supporting an open sourced graphics card miner for zcash.
Donation addresses
voxelot:
BTC Donations: 1A67XmfyukPNbrMmckBToE8xZPesuM6Ti1
ETH: 0x82a642cAFD6bFc228C7B5Ea0394A0Ad702A7c03D
omaralv:
ETH:
0x000DCB7ccB55faDaEc5C4A13E173a1E30e643867
BTC:
18tvCqDFAFWv3jwDqXe5SBs6bmy9Xn4bnN
1 Like
Hello this is the 3rd message to you my friend I want to have access to the GPU miner Zog. In a message you mention you would give access to donators If I send you 0.5 btc right now how will you keep your word thank you
Awaiting addy and instruction
NB: I am new to ubuntu I barely mine on OCs pool with str4d miner
Let me know if you need pizza
1 Like
Still need to spend the weekend hammering out why I am getting upper bound 5 solutions some runs (may be acceptable) but the time is looking fairly good for not being optimized at all.
I have not committed this yet to hope to avoid a bunch of git pulls. This is stand alone c.
1 Like
So you are getting 28.4H/s with your 480 ?
That was just one run. I need to do some stats over a 1000 runs at different nonces. I am noticing that the number of solutions found is varying between 1 and 5 depending on the nonce. I am not sure if this is normal behavior. I have a lot of testing to do over the weekend.
I would suppose you should average that time to 2 solutions if everything is running correctly, so ~11.36H/s. Still not bad considering I see tons of places to optimize already.
One user has 7,316.779 H/s on suprnova pool 
Is he running all that power in testnet?
https://zec.suprnova.cc/index.php?page=statistics&action=pool
2 big users
- 7,316.779 H/s
- 2,335.759
Note: Unless @ocminer is faking something, the diff should be sky high now.
supernova Pool hash power is 8,015.000, while entire testnet hash power is much much lower (171)
How is it possible?
{
“blocks” : 10029,
“currentblocksize” : 0,
“currentblocktx” : 0,
“difficulty” : 1531.05263796,
“errors” : “WARNING: check your network connection, 0 blocks received in the last 4 hours (96 expected)”,
“genproclimit” : 2,
“networkhashps” : 171,
“pooledtx” : 0,
“testnet” : true,
“chain” : “test”,
“generate” : false
}
1 Like
171 H/s
Network Hashrate
That’s what Im seeing aswell
It seems they are runnning with beta1.
Beta2/RC1 block height is at 10004, supernova mined ~12000 block.
1 Like