Because of the ongoing issues with transactions to z addresses we will publish a guide tomorrow on how to move those funds to regular t addresses. This procedure will also allow you to move funds mined under testnet zcash addresses to regular addresses.
Please note that this will be a manual process and performed only once. Please do not mine to z addresses on the pool for now.
when 0.6 genoil has stable connect, it is fine, but upon reconnect pool shows zero hash while interface shows normal hashing with shares being accepted. why is that?
my take is that upon reconnect pool is delaying credit for shares (somehow considering miner as non existing)
maybe it is just a delay effect
Can I just wait until the z-addr bug is fixed? I have my payout set high, so it will be many days before itās due from the pool. If zcash canāt fix the bug, they have no coin, since thatās the central feature of zcash.
I would recommend to move over to a t1 address. We might need to disable payments to z addresses for a longer period of time given the issues we are currently facing when dealing with those addresses.
OK. So, restart my miners with the t-addr, then you move the z-addr balance to the t-addr after I give you the info, and thatās it? Just donāt use that z-addr again?
@peter_zcash So, what exactly is being shown for āSharesā? Itās definitely no a value equal to the number of accepted shares seen on the miner side. Iāve tracked one of my workers for a couple hours and seen ~300 accepted shares per hour, but the status page only shows numbers in the 40-50 range for that worker. Thanks!
The number of shares is calculated according to the shares you submitted during the last hour. We are in the process of adjusting the static share difficulty to match the increased efficiency of the available miners. The share chart is just informative and does not affect payments. We might remove it all together till we have found the optimal share difficulty for the pool.
Hello there.
Nice pool, no issues so far.
Three questions:
-Do the invalid solutions count to anything? I.e. if i have a miner that produces 5% invalid solutions, would it result in extra fee or something compared to the same miner with an extra filter to remove the bad ones?
-Does the target/difficulty the pool gives for shares depend on the hashrate of the client? That is, would a 400 sol/s box-o-GPUs get handled the same as a 4 sol/s phone?
As you may know, Iāve been mining on ethermine.org for many months, so Iām used to your share statistics there. The shares on the ETH pool are the same as the accepts I see on my side in the stratum log. Since you are running both pools on a fixed diff, is there a reason why flypool canāt simply report the number of valid solutions submitted to the pool in the Shares stats, along with an invalid count? I guess Iām just wondering why flypool doesnāt report shares exactly like ethermine.org. Iāve always liked the ethermine stats. And thanks for all your great effort; I know bringing up flypool has been a lot of work and will be for a while
And thanks for all your great effort; I know bringing up flypool has been a lot of work and will be for a while